1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Art [367]
4 years ago
13

When did racsim first occur

Social Studies
2 answers:
jekas [21]4 years ago
5 0
The Nineteenth century was an age of emancipation, nationalism, and imperialism--all of which contributed to the growth and intensification of ideological racism in Europe and the United States.
Lapatulllka [165]4 years ago
5 0
In 1667 racism first occured
You might be interested in
After he gained control of the roman empire constantine moved to the capitol to
Tcecarenko [31]
The "he" here is Constantine the Great,  and he moved the capital of the Roman Empire to the city named Constantinopole,  previously Byzantium,  which today is known as Istanbul, Turkey's biggest city.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Great Compromise creates what type of Congress
Natalija [7]
A two chambered Congress
5 0
4 years ago
Walter firey went beyond urban ecology by incorporating ________ and ________ into his analysis
AleksAgata [21]
<span>Walter Firey was a professor of sociology from the University of Texas. Urban ecology constituted with very basic relationship with each other. He has moved ahead of urban ecology by utilizing sentiment and symbolism to his analysis as the variables.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Should the United States Enact Mandatory Voting Legislation?
Arte-miy333 [17]

Of course, the range of arguments supporting compulsory voting is matched by a plethora of reasons why the U.S. should keep voting voluntary.

One of the major arguments given by those against compulsory voting is that it leads to a greater number of uninformed voters, noting that those who choose not vote are generally less educated on political issues than those who choose to vote. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative consequences:

Misleading uninformed voters. It is often asserted that uninformed voters are more susceptible to the influence of money and spending on television ads. A short advertisement is likely to have a greater influence on an uninformed voter than one who already has strong views. This encourages the use of sensational and misleading advertising and may have a negative effect on campaigning techniques. While politicians no longer need to try to convince citizens to go out and vote, they still need to find ways to maximize their vote among less informed voters. Australian political scientist, Haydon Manning notes that compulsory voting often “require[s] banal sloganeering and crass misleading negative advertising.”

Ignoring the wishes of most voters. Since uninformed voters are more easily persuaded, some politicians may choose to focus on marginal voters and ignore their main base of support. Even if compulsory voting leads to less polarization, it may not result in better policy outcomes because complicated and nuanced legislation may be perceived negatively by swing voters.

Dampening the voice of the majority. An additional concern under a compulsory system is that people who are uninformed (or simply do not care about the outcome of an election) may end up voting randomly. The impact of ‘random’ votes ends up being particularly detrimental because it fails to increase civic engagement and may skew election results.

Compulsory voting presents some ethical challenges. Many people argue that it infringes upon individual liberty by denying people the ability to choose not to vote. While it is true that ballots may include a “none of the above” option (though, in practice, typically do not), the act of voting itself may be seen as “endorsing” the current politicians and political system, an endorsement that some citizens may not want to make.

While it seems pretty unlikely right now that compulsory voting will be adopted in the United States, at least on a federal level, it is a policy to keep in mind as America continues striving towards a better democracy.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why are informal powers more important than formal powers, particularly to modern presidents?
Eddi Din [679]
Formal powers are set in law and have to be followed or the supreme Court can get busted. informal powers are debatable and the president might be able to get away with something that isn't clearly laid out by the law.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which underlined word is an interjection? Eek! I just saw a mouse run under the table!
    11·1 answer
  • Because marla is the first girl in her fourth-grade class to sexually mature, she is sometimes teased and rejected by her classm
    14·1 answer
  • Cedric runs out of gas on the way to work. he thinks to himself—"how stupid i am!" cedric has experienced a form of a problem re
    8·1 answer
  • Answer this question please hurry!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Besides europe, what other areas were battlegrounds during world war i?a.South america, north america, australia b.South america
    8·1 answer
  • Which phrase best supports an Allusion?
    15·1 answer
  • Black Codes were the first form of segregation laws after the Civil War.
    13·1 answer
  • When participants in a study were forced to smile while watching cartoons, they labeled them as even funnier and happier than pa
    11·1 answer
  • One status tends to take rank above all others. The status that plays the greatest role in shaping a person’s life and determini
    6·1 answer
  • According to the quotation, what did President Reagan believe about economic growth?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!