Answer:
She violated the duty of loyalty
Explanation:
One of the fiduciary duties of a director is to always act in the best interest of the company .
Similar to this is the duty of loyalty that prevents the director from acting against the interest of the company and also guide the director against activities that could bring conflict of interest whereby he is involved in reaping personal benefits from the position she occupies .
This describes Wendy's action of personal dealing based on her position as the president of Kite sale
Answer: Inventories and cost of goods sold.
Explanation:
Standard costing is used in accounting and it simply has to do with the substitution of the cost that's expected for a product with an actual cost when preparing financial statements.
The difference that's then between the actual costs and expected costs are then recorded as variance. It should also be noted that when a company prepares financial statements using standard costing, the items that are reported at standard cost will be Inventories and the cost of goods sold.
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
Answer:
$3,500
Explanation:
Placing a stop-loss order at $165 means that the last amount that the stock traded, it had a price of $165 per share.
Based on that, it is evident that each stock has lost $35 when compared to the price at which the stop-loss order was placed and the initial cost per share of $200.
Loss per share=$200-$165=$35
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=loss per share*number of shares owned
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=$35*100
The loss incurred on 100 shares of IBM=$3,500
