Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
IM DOING ALGEBRA TOOO I HATE IT I believe that the first answe is function 4
Answer:
<em>True
</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Rate Of Change Of Functions
</em>
Given a function y=f(x), the rate of change of f can be computed as the slope of the tangent line in a specific point (by using derivatives), or an approximation by computing the slope of a secant line between two points (a,b) (c,d) that belong to the function. The slope can be calculated with the formula

If this value is calculated with any pair of points and it always results in the same, then the function is linear. If they are different, the function is non-linear.
Let's take the first two points from the table (1,1)(2,4)

Now, we use the second and the third point (2,4) (3,9)

This difference in values of the slope is enough to state the function is non-linear
Answer: True
Hello,
Please, see the attached file.
Thanks.