Answer:
$0.6
Explanation:
Nominal interest rate (i) = 9% = 0.09
Output (Y) = 1,000
Money supply(M) = 1,200
==> (M/P)^d = (0.6Y) / i^(1/2)
==> 1200/P = 0.6*1000 / 0.09^(1/2)
==> 1200/P = 600 / 0.3
==> 1200/P = 2000
==> 1200 = 2000 * P
==> P = 1200/2000
==> P = $0.6
Therefore, the price level is $0.6
Answer:
The Price of Cocaine would rise drastically
Explanation:
If U.S Drugs Enforcement Agency impose higher restrictions in an effort to control illegal import of cocaine into the United States, this would directly impact the market for illegal drugs in the following ways:
- Since more restrictions get imposed, the procurement cost of cocaine alongside the risk associated with it in the form of higher penalties and prosecution, both will rise.
- The supply of cocaine would shrink in the market.
- The above two outcomes would result into the procurers and peddlers demanding much greater price for the same quantity of cocaine so as to compensate for the higher risk assumed and higher procurement costs associated.
Thus, price of cocaine will rise drastically as an outcome of such a move.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I believe it is the interest rate the federal reserve uses for loaning to banks. Its the minimal rate, also.
Answer:
$84 unfavorable
Explanation:
The computation of the activity variance for supplies cost is shown below:
Supplies cost for the standard one is
= $1,840 + (624 frames × $12 per frame)
= $9,328
And, the supplies cost for the actual one is
= $1,840 + (631 frames × $12)
= $9,412
So the activity variance is
= $9,328 - $9,412
= $84 unfavorable
As the standard cost is less than the actual one
Given the table showing <span>next year's expected costs
and activities below:
![\begin{tabular} {|C||C|C|} & Mixing & Baking\\[1ex] Direct labor hours&411,000 DLH&91,000 DLH\\ Maching hours&811,000 MH&811,000 MH\\[1ex] Overhead costs&\$534,300&\$411,000 \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7CC%7C%7CC%7CC%7C%7D%0A%20%26%20Mixing%20%26%20Baking%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0ADirect%20labor%20hours%26411%2C000%20DLH%2691%2C000%20DLH%5C%5C%0AMaching%20hours%26811%2C000%20MH%26811%2C000%20MH%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0AOverhead%20costs%26%5C%24534%2C300%26%5C%24411%2C000%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)
Pard A:
</span><span>Aztec's departmental
overhead rate for the mixing department based on direct labor
hours is given by the mixing department's overhead cost divided by the mixing department's direct labor hours.
Thus, </span><span>departmental
overhead rate for the mixing department based on direct labor
hours is given by:

Part B:
</span>Aztec's departmental
overhead rate for the baking department based on direct labor
hours <span>is given by the baking department's overhead cost divided by the baking department's direct labor hours.
</span><span>Thus, <span>departmental
overhead rate for the baking department based on direct labor
hours is given by:

Part 3:
</span></span>Aztec's departmental
overhead rate for the baking department based on machine
hours <span>is given by the baking department's overhead cost divided by the baking department's machine hours.
</span><span>Thus, <span>departmental
overhead rate for the baking department based on machine
hours is given by:

</span></span>