It's a conflict of interest. Where on one hand she knows what she should do and on the other there's something that she wants. Since there's the option for own personal gains with the two, it's conflict of interest.
what happened to you during christmas break?
The human being is a rational animal and responsible for its own acts. In addition, the human being is capable of doing innumerable activities that can be turned towards good and evil. A magnificent animal like the human being must take responsibility for the respect and well-being of other living beings that do not have the same capabilities.
But I ask you: Have we really promoted the respect and well-being of other living beings?
The answer to this question is controversial, but its reasoning is easy to establish. For we have countless cases, where the human being has mistreated and disrespected the animals in general.
The human being has promoted, hunting, the imprisonment and the destruction of the animals' natural habitat in a competently insonsequent way and without thinking about the suffering that causes these beings. In addition, domestic animals are mistreated and abandoned every day, not only in our country, but worldwide.
This is not a recent behavior of the human being, as it has been established for many years. However, it needs to be stopped now, as a measure of wildlife protection and as a measure of responding and achieving responsibility that uses your reasoning for good and progress.
A, with each parenthetical citation you must include one in the bibliography.
You can tell if an argument is valid by the facts that are presented or if its their own opinion. The more facts the more valid the argument is.
Hope that helped :)
