A Canadian football field is 110 yd long and an American football field is 100 yd
1 answer:
You might be interested in
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) The new triangle is a reflection of the original across the origin. All angles, segment lengths, and line slopes have been preserved: the transformed triangle is congruent with the original.
b) The new triangle is a reflection of the original across the origin and a dilation by a factor of 2. Angles have been preserved: the transformed triangle is similar to the original. The transformation is NOT rigid.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. The transformed triangle is blue in the attachment. It is congruent with the original. The transformation is "rigid," a reflection across the origin. All angles and lengths have been preserved, as well as line slopes.
__
2. The transformed triangle is orange in the attachment. It is similar to the original, in that angles have been preserved and lengths are proportional. It is a reflection across the origin and a dilation by a factor of 2. Line slopes have also been preserved. A dilation is NOT a "rigid" transformation.
I found the dot plots that accompanies this problem.
Based on the plots, the <span>statement that gives is a valid comparison of the number of candies in the bags of the two Brands is:
</span><span>B. The number of candies in the bags from Brand B is greater and less consistent than the number of candies in the bags from Brand A.
Dots in Brand B are scattered and whereas dots in Brand A are not and they are more concentrated between 52 to 55 range. </span>
Based on the plots, the <span>statement that gives is a valid comparison of the number of candies in the bags of the two Brands is:
</span><span>B. The number of candies in the bags from Brand B is greater and less consistent than the number of candies in the bags from Brand A.
Dots in Brand B are scattered and whereas dots in Brand A are not and they are more concentrated between 52 to 55 range. </span>