Answer:
Explanation:
HR processes involved to activities:
Employee leasing and outsourcing → Recruitment
Organizing orientation programs → Training
Expanding certain departments ans closing down others → right sizing
Providing paid vacation time to employee → designing compensation package
Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Under the direct method of cost allocation, each and every service department cost would be distributed to the producing department that depend upon the square footage of space. Also the service of service department would be used by the other service department would not be considered.
So here the custodial service cost would be distributed to the producing department A and producing department b and no cost would be distributed to the general admin department
Hence, the $0 would be allocated
Answer:
C. produce products and services that coordinate with hundreds or more firms and suppliers.
Explanation:
- A supply chain complexity increase as the firms moves in an inter-connected and interdependencies network where a change in one element has an effect on the other elements,
- And is caused by a variety of factors and s often due to the rising consumer expectation and expanded product and services and is coordinated with hindered or more firms and suppliers.
Answer:
The Correct option is <u>"B"</u>
Explanation:
Any person who by arguments verbal or written or by behavior characterize himself, or wittingly documents himself to be drawn, to be a companion in a very secure, is responsible as a companion in this organization to any person who has on the religion of one such illustration specified credit to the organization, whether or not the individual signifying himself or drawn to be a companion will or doesn't understand that the illustration has extended the individual therefore providing credit.
Answer:
The correct answer is b) American will leave fares unchanged and Southwest will leave fares unchanged.
Explanation:
The Nash Balance is a situation where individuals or players have no incentive to change their strategy taking into account the strategy of their opponents.
In the Nash equilibrium, the strategy chosen by each participant of a conflict or game is optimal, given the strategy chosen by the others. In other words, nobody will gain anything if they decide to change their strategy under the assumption that the other individuals do not change theirs.
It should be noted that under the Nash equilibrium the greatest gain is not necessarily obtained for all individuals or players as a whole. It is only true that each responds optimally to the strategy of others. In many cases, individuals would like to be able to reach another balance with higher profits but fail to do so because they face the risk of being betrayed.
