The answer is B because there is no verb present so it is a fragment.
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
Answer:
Their
Explanation:
The definition of pronoun is "a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse (e.g., I, you ) or to someone or something mentioned elsewhere in the discourse (e.g., she, it, this ).
"
The sentence that shows that Icarus is reckless is "Who could remember to be careful when he was to fly for the first time?" Reckless is the opposite of careful. When Icarus was told to be careful, he did not even listened to his father as shown in the preceding sentence: "For Icarus, these cautions went in at one ear and out by the other."
D is the answer hope i helped
