1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
13

If law enforcement has reasonable suspicion that a person is engaged in criminal activity,

Law
1 answer:
sveta [45]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is the main source of funds to run public schools, including expenses like paying teachers' salaries and running cafeterias
UNO [17]

Answer:

Most commonly, the federal government contributes about 7% of the total school budget, and the remainder is split fairly evenly between local contributions (primarily raised through local property taxes) and state contributions (primarily raised through state income taxes and sales taxes)

Explanation:

i dont know f thats what you wanted but theres an answer

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Pat and Terry have lived as a couple for two years in New Hampshire. Pat has beaten Terry more than once. Terry has been in the
lianna [129]

Answer:

Yes, law enforcement can use the recording in court because it is a direct personal threat.

Explanation:

Pat is threatening Terry with violence and possible murder, which is impiled when Pat said "No one will ever find your body". This can be used in court to support Terry's case that Pat has or could become violent and hurt Terry at some point.

3 0
2 years ago
HELP PLZ
pishuonlain [190]

The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.

Option : B and C.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.

Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.

Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.

Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.

6 0
3 years ago
What are the consequences of not following the list of Assumptions and Principles in accounting?​
andrey2020 [161]
Jasmjenemenwmkwkwjwjwnehsbsbhw
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1) A) Use multiple elaborated historical examples from each decade to explain
    10·1 answer
  • The landmark US Supreme Court case Metro-Goldwin-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005) exempts information c
    12·2 answers
  • Can anyone explain what i need to look forward to for high school and what i need to do if i want to be a traffic lawer? If you
    9·1 answer
  • gubernatorial appointment refers which of the following? A. an appointment by a governor B. an appointment by the constituients
    7·2 answers
  • If Law does not punish the criminal what should be the condition of this universe?
    10·1 answer
  • If I commit a war crime during a civil war, would it be called a war crime or a civil war crime?
    13·1 answer
  • This function of political parties is considered the most important because it is where political parties name their candidates
    10·1 answer
  • Inductive Reasoning is certanity that the conculsion is true.<br> O True<br> O False
    10·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    11·1 answer
  • NATIONAL AUTO DEALERS EXCHANGE, L.P., PLAINTIFF,
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!