Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
The president uses mass media to speak to people all over the world.
The president uses mass media to veto bills passed by Congress.
The president uses mass media to communicate with Congress.
The president uses mass media to generate support for executive orders.
Hellmo, love it yes do more of these
Answer:
any reason the supervisor or senior official deems appropriate
Explanation:
the probationary period generally does not require fair procedures to be following if being terminated.
