Answer:
President Jimmy Carter authorized the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States for medical treatment — with catastrophic consequences. Carter blundered because of vacillation, shortsighted thinking, a disregard for identified risk and inept implementation that included zero precautions to protect against disaster.
As Trump charts a new course with one of the most powerful nations in the Middle East, Carter’s missteps offer him valuable lessons: When dealing with Iran, a president must verify that information is accurate, consider risks carefully and imagine how one’s own actions will be perceived by Iranians, who evaluate circumstances through an entirely different historical prism.
Like his predecessors, Carter considered Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi an ally and friend. In December 1977, he visited Tehran and toasted the shah for making Iran “an island of stability” and for “the admiration and love which your people give you.” It was a delusional toast, one that demonstrated a total lack of understanding of historical legacies and the political fires raging in Iran.
Power was slipping from the shah’s grasp thanks to a growing revolutionary movement inspired by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and nurtured by resistance to royal repression. This revolution reached a tipping point on Jan. 16, 1979, when security risks forced the shah to flee the country.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both had to do with states that wanted to enter the U.S. California entered the Union as a free state. The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both created controversy when the tried to enter the Union.
Explanation:
The compromise also included a more stringent Fugitive Slave Law and banned the slave trade in Washington, D.C. The issue of slavery in the territories would be re-opened by the Kansas–Nebraska Act, but many historians argue that the Compromise of 1850 played a major role in postponing the American Civil War. What did Stephen Douglas try to accomplish with the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854? ... (A) Douglass tried to build a railroad and promote western settlement. This was no more successful than the Compromise of 1850.
The colonies' relationship was altered by increased interaction and a lack of care and representation from Britain.
<h3>
How did the colonial era affect the relationship between Britain and her colonies?</h3>
To address their financial problems, the British used taxes on the colonies. However, because they were not represented in Parliament, the colonies utilized non-importation pacts to persuade Britain to remove the laws. Merchants signed non-importation agreements pledging not to purchase goods from England. Britain has gotten progressively worse over time at maintaining the happiness of its colonies. By the end, colonists had lost any sense of solidarity with Britain, their motherland. Lack of representation and concern from Britain led to the decline in British colonial ties in the late 1700s.
To learn more about Britain's colony, visit;
brainly.com/question/7943552
#SPJ4
Answer:
George Washington, hes my best friend
