"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
Answer:
The Union Pacific and Central Pacific would compete for government generosity, because the line that built the most miles would get the most cash and land. The railroad would then be financed by selling this land.
Explanation:
The American Declaration of Independence was used in other revolutions around the world:
B.) because it ended the practice of colonialism
The Declaration of Independence was a step towards the American colonies declaring freedom from British rule.
Answer: Focus groups
Explanation:
A focus group involves a gathering of people whom are deliberately selected to take part in a discussion intended to know their opinion regarding certain topics or area of interest. Such discussions are usually held in environments that are non-threatening. A focus group encourages members to influence and interact with each other during the consideration and discussion of ideas. In this scenario, in order to increase the attendance during games, a moderator was hired to lead informal discussions with about 6 to 19 fans in order to know what they like and dislike about the baseball team.
Answer:
This is law of effect.
Explanation:
The "law of effect" is a principle developed by "Edward Thorndike". It is the principle on behavioral conditioning, which means that if a response has a pleasing effect are likely to occur again. And if a reaction doesn’t produce satisfying effect would have less frequency in future. For example, if an employee is praised by the boss for starting his work early, it is likely that the employee’s behavior will repeat in future.
Thus, the given statement is law of effect.
