It was necessary to have five constitutional amendments to expand voting rights to ensure "every adult citizen could vote for any candidates of their choice regardless of color, gender, and financial capability."
This is evident in the five amendments on voting rights, with each amendment solving an issue relating to voting rights.
The five amendments are the following:
- Fifteenth amendment: solve the issue relating to race, color, or servitude.
- The nineteenth amendment: gave women the right to vote.
- The twenty-third amendment: gave the right to vote for representatives.
- Twenty-fourth amendment: solve the issue of the poll tax in the election.
- Twenty-sixth amendment: solve the issue of age restrictions. Voters must be 18 and above.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that five constitutional amendments to expand voting rights were necessary to avoid disenfranchisement of any adult citizens in voting during an election.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22970867
Answer:
JOHN PYNCHON commenced his mercantile career in trade with the Indians of the upper Connecticut Valley in 1652, a traffic that dominated the economic life of western Massachusetts for almost half a century after the first English settlement. He received all of his training from his father, William Pynchon, a founder of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who made the fur trade his principal enterprise from 1636 to 1652, when he returned to England, where he spent the restof his life. The fur trade reached its height in the late fifties, and though it then declined, the son’s efforts to sustain it continued for more than a decade. The commerce of New Englanders in beaver and other peltry was of prime importance to the colonial economy, and until 1676 the Connecticut Valley was one of the few important fur-trading regions.
<span>An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. It was published in 1689 though</span>
Answer:
Opportunity cost is what is given up to obtain something, or the cost of doing something instead of another thing.
The opportunity cost of leisure would be best explained as the monetary value of time spent not working, or in other words, the income that is not received when you are not working.
For example, if a person works 8 hours a day, five days a week, making $20/hour, he will earn, by the end of the week, a total of $800 dollars. However, if he decides to cut back his hours in order to go to swimming classes in the afternoon, and now works 6 hours a day, five days a week, he will now make $600 dollars, so the opportunity cost of leisure for him is $200 dollars.
I believe this is D! Hope it helps you in any way.
