Yes, I presume it’s True.
Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?
I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
Answer:
b. The punishment imposed by the community should be of equal or greater severity than the crime itself.
Explanation:
Utilizing community justice practices, police, courts, redresses and government work with one another and numerous others in high effect areas to:
-
restore individuals who affront
- fix the damages brought about by wrongdoing
- keep wrongdoing from happening once more, or in any case.
Answer:
A. Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses
The First Amendment provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” These two clauses are referred to as the “establishment clause” and the “free exercise clause.” As with that part of the First Amendment which protects freedom of speech, both of these clauses have been applied to the states, and therefore operate against all levels of government in the United States. The free exercise clause protects the religious beliefs, and to a certain extent, the religious practices of all citizens. The more controversial establishment clause prohibits the government from endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities.
Both clauses protect the same values, and often a violation of one would also be a violation of the other. For example, mandatory prayer in schools would constitute an improper establishment of religion and would also interfere with the free exercise rights of those students who did not believe in that particular prayer or prayer in general.
Explanation:
