The correct answer is C. The Congressional Record.
Besides this, you might also look in the congressional library.
Explanation:
The Chalcolithic period, or Copper Age, was an era of transition between the stone tool-using farmers of the Neolithic and the metal-obsessed civilizations of the Bronze Age. The Copper Age was really a phenomenon of the eastern Mediterranean regions, and occurred from roughly 3500 to 2300 BCE.
Answer:
Secondary reinforcers
Explanation:
A secondary reinforcer is a type of stimulus or situation that functions as a reinforcer because it has been paired with another stimulus that also functions as a reinforcer. In this case, the reinforcer is the good grade. In turn, the secondary reinforcers are the praise and the money, both of which seem to be effective with Curtis.
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
Answer:
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Explanation:
i love this question.
