Answer: The percentage of respondents said that the gas prices are“Not at all annoying” are 12.57%
Explanation: There are 1018 respondents out of which 128 respondents said that the gas prices are “Not at all annoying”
Where, Number of respondents “Not at all annoying” = 128
Total Number of respondents = 1018
Percentage of the respondents = 128 ÷ 1018 * 100
Percentage of the respondents = 0.1257367 *100
Therefore, the percentage of respondents who said is not annoying is 12.57%.
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part. In three years the company will save $12,000.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Units= 40,000
Variable costs= $1.60 per unit
Fixed costs= $40,000 per year
Gilberto is considering buying the part from a supplier for a quoted price of $2.70 per unit guaranteed for three years.
We need to calculate the total cost of making and buying the part.
Make in-house:
Total cost= 1.6*40,000 + 40,000= $104,000
Buy:
Total cost= 40,000*2.7= $108,000
It is cheaper to make the part. In three years the company will save $12,000.
Answer:
<em>The correct answer is:</em> incorporates financial and nonfinancial measures in an integrated system.
Explanation:
The balanced scorecard can be defined as an approach to measuring and managing an organization's performance.
Because it is a flexible method, it can be adapted to different companies and situations.
The method uses financial and non-financial measures in an integrated system so that managers can monitor and control by means of indicators whether the planning outlined for the company is actually being effective for the achievement of objectives and goals. In the balanced scorecad, the indicators are analyzed from 4 perspectives: <u>Financial, Customer, Internal Processes and Learning and Growth.
</u>
This method assists in a more active management, aimed at a greater vision of business systems and the possibility of managing strategic actions so that the company remains competitive and innovative in the long run.
Self-confidence is considered one of the most influential motivators and regulators of behavior in people's everyday lives (Bandura, 1986). A growing body of evidence suggests that one's perception of ability or self-confidence is the central mediating construct of achievement strivings (e.g., Bandura, 1977; Ericsson et al., 1993; Harter, 1978; Kuhl, 1992; Nicholls, 1984). Ericsson and his colleagues have taken the position that the major influence in the acquisition of expert performance is the confidence and motivation to persist in deliberate practice for a minimum of 10 years.
Self-confidence is not a motivational perspective by itself. It is a judgment about capabilities for accomplishment of some goal, and, therefore, must be considered within a broader conceptualization of motivation that provides the goal context. Kanfer (1990a) provides an example of one cognitively based framework of motivation for such a discussion. She suggests that motivation is composed of two components: goal choice and self-regulation. Self-regulation, in turn, consists of three related sets of activities: self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reactions. Self-monitoring provides information about current performance, which is then evaluated by comparing that performance with one's goal. The comparison between performance and goal results in two distinct types of self-reactions: self-satisfaction or -dissatisfaction and self-confidence expectations. Satisfaction or dissatisfaction is an affective response to past actions; self-confidence expectations are judgments about one's future capabilities to attain one's goal. This framework allows a discussion of self-confidence as it relates to a number of motivational processes, including setting goals and causal attributions.
Answer:
The correct answer is normative analysis.
Explanation:
A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.
In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.
