In inductive reasoning, the premises are seen as supplying strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The conclusion is definite, but the truth may be probable, based on the available evidence. So she might say, that based on the past history of the company involved, whenever the company is losing money for a given length of time, there are layoffs, so in these similar circumstances it is probable that these planned layoffs will occur.
Answer:
The correct option is B,only if it is in writing.
Explanation:
Such promise is not enforceable since one of key elements of enforceable agreement(contract) is missing.
The missing element is that Abner is not getting anything of value in return for the promise to pay for Claudia's trumpet.
The only way to get Abner to fulfill the promise in law parlance is get the promise documented as well as signed by Abner,that can be used as an evidence against Abner in future in order to ensure the promise is fulfilled.
Answer:
A) Total revenue = 400 loaves of bread x $2 per loaf of bread = $800
B) Total economic costs = (5 units of labor x $40 per unit of labor) + (7 units of land x $60 per unit of land) + (2 units of capital x $60 per unit of capital) + (1 unit of entrepreneurial ability x $20 per unit) = $200 + $420 + $120 + $20 = $760
C) Economic profit or loss = total revenue - total economic costs = $800 - $760 = $40
Answer:
The correct answer is: add exports but subtract imports in calculating GDP.
Explanation:
National income refers to the production of goods and services by the residents of a nation within the geographical boundaries of a nation in a given period.
In the calculation of national income, net exports are included. This net export is the difference between exports and imports. In other words, we can say that exports are added and imports are included.
