Answer:
to manage roads, bridges, and railways
Explanation:
I'll explain why the other options are wrong.
- to develop new forms of transportation is wrong because Americans adopted a free market economy. Private companies tend to be the one who develop new form of transportation and introduced them to the market.
- to reduce dependency on car use is wrong because there it is what they advocated to the public, not necessarily their responsibility. Responsibility is the things that they have to achieve. Whether you use a car or not is more of a personal choice.
- to ensure equal access to public transportation is more of a human right issue. Which means that it's the responsibility of the federal government rather than department of transportation.
Answer:
Option C.
Explanation:
Parking ticket paid on business auto, is the right answer.
The term Business expense is used to describe the expenses that are essential to run a business. In this way, all the expenses that are made on land, resources and labor etc are included in the Business expense. Accordingly, the basic expenses, as well as compulsory expenses, includes the payment of tax, rent, salary etc.
Thus according to the given question "Parking ticket paid on business auto" will not come under the category of Business expense.
Answer:
karma, dharma, moksha and reincarnation
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest if this helps!
Answer:
relationship orientation
Explanation:
According to my research on different sales approach, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this dealership has adopted a relationship orientation approach. This is a sales approach that focuses on developing a bond with the client in order to provide a better service and understand what is the best product for that client.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
d. individual prisons exceeded 100 percent intended capacity.
Explanation:
In the 2011 case of Brown v. Plata , the Supreme Court ordered California to release prisoners if individual prisons exceeded 100 percent intended capacity.
The Supreme Court made the order to the state of California to release prisoners if they could not provide a constitutionally mandated level of prison holding numbers.
