Answer: Gitlow vs. New York
Explanation:
It was a case between Bejamin Gitlow and New York about a publication with bad tendency.
There is a widespread opinion on both sides of the Atlantic that as the Magna Carta is to the British attachment to rights, the American version of this attachment is to be found in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Sometimes we hear more: that not only the origin, but also the substance of the U.S. version, is to be found in the Magna Carta.
To be sure, we have to start the rights narrative somewhere and since participants in the rights debate over 400 years don’t seem inclined to go further back than the Magna Carta, it seems reasonable to start there. And despite the feudal language and medieval concerns that run through, and thus date, the document, there is something enduring there that appeals to subsequent generations.
We suggest that the enduring quality is an appeal through the centuries that those who govern us do so in a reasonable manner. And all the better to secure the proposition that rulers exercise their power in a reasonable manner, we write down what we think is unreasonable conduct. Thus a list of what those in authority can’t do emerges.
In particular, we might say that the Magna Carta calls for the rule of law in opposition to the rule of unreasonable men. Furthermore, the rule of law is to be secured by an attachment to the due process of law.
The question then is how much of the Magna Carta made its way into the U. S. Bill of Rights? The answer is 9 of the 26 provisions in the Bill of Rights can be traced back to the Magna Carta. That’s about a third or 33%. And these provisions are heavily concerned with the right to petition and the due process of law.
The Magna Carta does not call for an abolition of the monarchy or a change in the feudal order. Nor does it call for religious freedom or freedom of the press. The U.S. Bill of Rights, however, presupposes the abolition of monarchy and feudalism; the American appeal to natural rights raises the question of religious freedom and freedom of the press.
Answer:
C) are of the same religion
Explanation:
North Africa and Southwest Asia are on two different continents, but are considered one region. This is MAINLY because the people in this region "are of the same religion".
North Africa and Southwest Asia are made up of countries that come from two continents but it's still known as a region. This is true because the people in this area share things in common. One of the most important characteristic of these two continents is that many of the people follow the Islamic religion.
Answer: Covers the history of the Industrial Revolution and the poor living conditions for the working class.
The living conditions in the cities and towns were miserable and characterized by: overcrowding, poor sanitation, spread of diseases, and pollution. As well, workers were paid low wages that barely allowed them to afford the cost of living associated with their rent and food.
Explanation:I hope I can help you :)
The factor which is the underlying use of cause at the root of the conflicts in the Sudan is:
<h3>What is Conflict?</h3>
This refers to the disagreement between two or more people where there is strife and in some cases can lead to armed attacks and loss of life and destruction of properties.
With this in mind, we can see that in the Sudan, there are many different ethnic groups and as a result of these heterogeneous tribes, there has been conflicts between each other for a long time,
Read more about conflicts here:
brainly.com/question/2267795
