Answer: Human Error
Explanation:
Human error has to be accounted for because contraceptives are not 100% reliable and it could be used properly and still result into unwanted results. Body types varies although likelihood of it working may be reasonably assured it’s not absolutely assured.
Answer:
D. Primary
Explanation:
The newly issued securities are first sold to the investors of the primary market .
The primary market id responsible for issuing the securities for the exchange of the company , or other groups .
The primary market are run by the underwriting groups which includes the investment banks .
Hence , from the information of the question , the correct term is ( d. ) Primary market .
The account should be opened as Joint Account With Tenants In Common.
<h3>Joint Account With Tenants In Common</h3>
in these Joint accounts with tenants in common A Totten Trust is a payable on death bank account. Such an account allows the owner to leave funds to a named beneficiary (or beneficiaries), avoiding probate. The only problem is that it can't be used for brokerage accounts - it is only for bank accounts. To accomplish what the couple wants requires that a joint account be set up as tenants in common, with the percentage ownership split between the husband and wife. Then the husband must have his own will, leaving his share to his natural children; and the wife must have her own will, leaving her share to her natural children.
If an account is opened as a Joint Account with Tenants in Common, there is a specified ownership percentage for each tenant. Upon death of 1 tenant, that person's percentage goes to his or her estate, is passed by will and must go through probate (where someone could contest the transfer).
Learn more about Joint account with tenants in common here :
brainly.com/question/14998321
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>less risk</u>
Explanation:
Note: <u>The question appears to be incomplete. Another similar question has been attached for reference purpose and the answer provided herein is based upon that</u>.
It is common consumer behavior of sticking to a brand name despite another lower cost option providing the same base or constituent. Particularly in case of necessities, the law of demand i.e lower price higher demand fails as consumer would prefer being exposed to lesser risk no matter whatever be the cost.
In the given case, the consumer i.e Cole prefers going with a brand name as it provides him with a higher degree of assurance as the brand has a certain reputation attached to it which the other generic option lacks.
Secondly owing to his familiarity with the drug and it's past usage experience, he has developed brand loyalty apparently.
Thus, Cole's decision is attributable to <u>less risk.</u>
Esta repsuea stasiod obqeado upr inculploirlas nrmoasde es giruidad-l
