Answer:8 barrels of oils per pair of shoe
Explanation:Greece and swizerland will need an average price by which they can both gain from trade.To ascertain the average price is by adding the 4 barrels of oil which Greece can forfeit and the 10 barrels of oil which Switzerland could also forfeit if it were into producing shoes.10+ 4 = 14/2 which almost 8 barrels to be given in exchange in other ensure a fair trade between both trading partners.
I think the likely response from the bank is that probably the date when you issued the checks is not the same when the beneficiary cashed or deposited them.
Answer:
The project to accept is:
e. E
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cost of capital = 10%
Mutually Exclusive Projects:
A B C E
Payback (years) 1 5 2 5
IRR 18% 20% 20% 12%
NPV (Millions) $40 $75 $35 $100
b) Project E should be preferred over all the other projects. It has the highest net present value (NPV) and its internal rate of return (IRR) is above the company's cost of capital. It surpasses projects A, B, and C in financial performance terms using time-value of money analysis.
Answer:
The computations are shown below:
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 229 units
The carrying cost is come from
= $2.40 × 20%
b. Time between placement of orders is
= Economic order quantity ÷Annual demand
= 229 ÷ 280
= 0.8179 years
So,
= 0.8179 × 365 days
= 298.53 days
We assume 365 days in a year
c. The average annual cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
= Holding cost + ordering cost
= (Economic order quantity ÷ 2 × Holding cost) + (Annual demand ÷ Economic order quantity × ordering cost)
= (229 units ÷ 2 × $0.48) + (280 ÷ 229 units × $45)
= $54.96 + $55.02
= $109.98
d)
Now the reorder level is
= Demand × lead time + safety stock
where, Demand equal to
= Expected demand ÷ total number of weeks in a year
= 280 pounds ÷ 52 weeks
= 5.38461
So, the reorder point would be
= 5.38461 × 3 + $0
= 16.15 pounds
Answer:
B. negative, positive
Explanation:
Substitution effect : Price rise of a good makes it relatively expensive, decreases its demand. Price fall of a good makes it relatively cheap, increases its demand.
So: Substitution Effect is always negative as per above explanation.
Income Effect : Price rise of a good decreases real income/ real purchasing power of consumer & reduces demand of all goods. Price fall increases real purchasing power & increases demand of all goods.
Income effect is positive in case of Normal Goods, normal good demand is positively related to income. The effect is negative in case of inferior goods, inferior good demand is negatively related to income.
Hence: Price rise of rice - Substitution effect results in negative change in rice consumption. {∵substitution effect always negative}
Income Effect leads to positive change in rice consumption {∵price rise reduces real income & income effect is negative for inferior goods}
