Self-defense is recognized by the common law as a defense against criminal charges on certain specific grounds.
<h3><u>Explanation:
</u></h3>
If in a gruesome act of self-defense, there is a serious bodily injury or death of the person attempting to hurt or potentially kill the other person, the act of the former is considered valid and reasonable.
This is because the common law grants each and every individual the right to fight and the right to defend oneself in situations that may culminate in death or serious physical injury.
Multiple legal battles and a Constitutional Court stalemate that prevented further action prevented the idea from being fully implemented.
<h3>What does it take to be president?</h3>
every single elected post in a country with an election government that acts also as head of state but often only has limited political authority. a president who is elected to serve as both the highest ideological executive and head of state under a system that has monarchic overtones.
<h3>Do you mean president, or leader?</h3>
In different businesses and organizations, the president may act as the leader of the executive team. However, in the commercial world, the general head of the organization is not always the best choice.
To know more about President visit:
brainly.com/question/4512901
#SPJ4
Once france withdrew from the French and Indian war didn't need Britain's protection anymore.
Option: C
Explanation:
The French and Indian War was happened during 1754 and 1763 captured the colonies of British America against New France, both of the side got protection from Americas and allies Indians. The British colonists were supported at various times by the Catawba and Cherokee tribes, and the French colonists were supported by Wabanaki tribes.
The war was continued for seven years in America in between French and India and ended by signing a treaty in between France, Great Britain and Spain. British colonies started conflicting with them during 1750 in Ohio river valley. It is ultimately turned into American revolution.
False; stop sympathizing with Delmar and to withhold any sort of positive
reinforcement to his pain behaviors would make him bear the pain.
How positive reinforcement works?
Positive reinforcement in operant conditioning refers to the addition of a reinforcing stimulus after a behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will occur again in the future. An action's response or behavior will get stronger if a positive result, circumstance, or reward follows it. Here Delmar needs positive reinforcement for reduction in pain.
Positive reinforcement's impact on motivation is another factor contributing to its appeal as a teaching strategy. Positive reinforcement may provide you the boost in motivation you need to accomplish the goals you set, whether you are using it on your staff to reward good work or on yourself to work toward personal goals. Delmar should use positive reinforcement against his pain behaviour.
Learn more about positive reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/15869859
#SPJ4
Answer:
see below *ALSO SPELL CHECK PLEASE GRAMMERLY ISNT WORKING FOR SOME REASON*
Explanation:
In the persepctive of the German people, the post-war punishment that would be percieved as the "harshest" or "most upsetting" was most likely punishment 1,4 and 5, and the ones that were probably viewed as the "east harsh" or insignificant to the German people was punishment 8. The reason that I assume that the harshest, most significant, and most upsetting punishment(s) were 1,4, and 5 is because these are the punishments that effected the german people <em>directly. </em>The loss of land probably led to relocation and people losing homes, property, etc. The fact that Germany has to take the blame for the war led to racism and prosecution of the German people, many of which had nothing to do with the war and wanted it to end as much as everyone else. And, lastly, punishment 5 was one of the most upsetting because the debt that Germany went into (-33 billion dollars!) will no doubt have caused inflammation of prices, poverty, and lack of resources due to low government funding, which would have effected the people the most, especially those who depended on government help and were not doing well financially to begin with. The punishment that was probably the least significant to the German people was 8, "force all military leaders, including Kaiser Wilhelm II to face trials for war crimes". This is because the people did not have a direct relation with any of these leaders, so it does not concern them as much as punishments like 1,4 and 5 did.
