One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
Answer:
The radius of the circle is 9 units.
Step-by-step explanation:
To calculate the area of the circle we need to find it's radius, since we have the area of the sector and it's angle, therefore we can calculate the radius by using the following formula:
sector area = (central angle)*pi*r²/360
27pi = 120*pi*r²/360
27pi = pi*r²/3
27 = r²/3
r² = 81
r = sqrt(81) = 9
The radius of the circle is 9 units.
If he ran 1/8 of a mile 24 times, it would be 24/8, which you can divide down into 3. Ron ran 3 miles.
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
Direct variation is of the form
y = kx
This has a constant added
y = kx+b so it is not a direct variation
