<h2>According to Allport, this preference is an example of a <u>Secondary trait</u></h2>
Explanation:
There are 3 types of traits.
1. Cardinal traits:
- This is the dominating traits
- The person can be found by the qualities
2. Secondary traits:
- This is closely related to attitudes
- This is also related to preferences of a human
- This would differ from person to person
- This might change according to the situation.
3. Central traits:
- This forms the base for the personality development
- This would be meaningful
- Central traits can be polite, helping, anxiety, etc.
Answer:
Value added
Explanation:
Value-added - it is the total difference that comes out between the product value in the market and the cost of producing that product. cost of a product is based on the survey which gives the idea that how much cost may be assigned to the product.
The value of this difference help to determine the profit on products.
Higher the value of add, higher will be the charges of product and higher will be the revenue collected.
Answer:
B. Persons on fixed incomes.
Explanation:
Inflation is a general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money, therefore, a person with a fixed income will not be affected.
Answer: $744,000
Explanation:
The amount that should be reported in the balance sheet for the patent, net of accumulated amortization, at December 31, 2020 will be:
First, we have to calculate the amortization recorded up to 2019. This will be:
= (1,240,000 / 10) x 2
= 248,000
The we calculate the amortization to be recognized in 2020. This will be:
= (1,240,000 – 248,000) / 4
= 248,000
The amount that should be reported in the balance sheet for the patent, net of accumulated amortization, at December 31, 2020 will be:
= 1240000 - 248000 - 248000
= $744,000
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
