Answer:
Stanza 1- She uses words such as "you" and "I know" to show that she is directly speaking towards it.
Stanza 2- She talks in past tense, as if it has a memory.
Stanza 3-She seems to reference situations in which the character has been in.
"simple" this shows that she thinks of the rat as a simple creature and is almost mad at others for wanting to be angry at the rat.
I think the rat could represent what people see as the "bottom of society". We are so quick to judge others for their simple actions, or rather, actions that differ from ours. It is represented clearly in this poem that she thinks of the rat just like everyone else.
Explanation:
"Select one word or phrase from the poem and comment on how the connotation of that word or phrase contribute to Acevedo characterization of the rat" DONT KNOW HOW TO DO THIS ONE
You didnt provide the title, so i cant make up something for that.
C. Preposition : among; object of the preposition : leaves.
Answer:
"The movies was so dull, I could barely keep my eyes open."
Explanation:
The statement basically states “Books should show us the real world and not a fantasy where we are thought to believe things. It must guide us in our time on Earth.” You are supposed to provide your opinion on what you think.
I would write something like this:
Literature has been around for centuries, maybe even millenniums. It has brought people out of the depths of despair and helped them over come problems in day-to- day life. There are all kinds of books out there - fantasy, adventure, romance, but should all those books be forgotten and thrown out for man only to read non-fictional books that are factual rather than interesting?
On one hand, books should be used as a tool for living. They should be informative and contain facts that could benefit us through out our lifetime. An interesting quote is, ‘Knowledge is the key to life’ therefore reading non-fiction books will help us in the future and reflect our actions when we grow up.
On the other hand, books have been brought to life to transport a person away from his troubles into a fictional world, where they are happy and blissful. Taking away such books and reading only factual information will not benefit a humans mind, for they will grow old and grumpy; they will obtain a lot of information but they will be dissatisfied with life - so what is the point of that? Moreover, books are books. No matter the genre or the origination of the book, it will teach us grammar and vocabulary which is vital for a human to know; it will make us emotionally happy and we will still gain knowledge from it.
In my opinion, Forster is wrong because a work of literature MUST provide a scope for the imagination and it must alter reality a little but for us to imagine - for without imagination, we are nothing.
I hope this helps, and please tell me what grade you got as I would love to know:))
B) believes that the constitution should be interpreted in light of changing conditions
