All categories

3 years ago

Can someone help me pls

Mathematics

1 answer:

lora16 [44]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

No solution

Step-by-step explanation:

A solution for a system of equations entails that all variables are the same. In this case, it means that both x and y must be the same.

Looking at the graph, there is no spot where y=3x+3 and 3x-y=2 intersect

To confirm, we can look at the equations. If we make them both equal to y, we can set them equal to each other.

For y=3x+3, this is already set to y. For 3x-y=2, we can add y to both sides and subtract 2 from both sides to get

3x-2=y

3x+3=y

Since the x and y values must be the same, we can say that

3x-2=3x+3

subtract 3x from both sides

-2 = 3

Since -2 is not equal to 3, we can confirm that there are no solutions to this system of equations

You might be interested in

Write in least to greatest order 0.56, 4.56, 0.65

SIZIF [17.4K]

Hey! The answer is: 0.56, 0.65, 4.56 ! Have a great day, bud!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write the equation of the line that passes through the points (7,-6) and (0,2). Put

Alex

Answer:

$y+6=\frac{-8}{7} (x-7)$

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the slope of the equation use $\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$ .

So, $\frac{-6-2}{7-0}$ = $\frac{-8}{7}$ . Now we can use our slope and any of the two points to write in point-slope form, which is $y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$ . Using the point (7,-6), the formula will give $y+6=\frac{-8}{7} (x-7)$ .

To check, you can plug in this equation and the points into a calculator to graph. The line passes through both points.

6 0

3 years ago

Michael bought a soccer ball for $15. It was 40% off the original price. What fraction represents the amount of the original pri

valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

B i think

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Pls helps me ill give u brainlest !!! Solve the following equation for x.

BARSIC [14]

Answer: C.

Step-by-step explanation: I used m.athway

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using reductio ad absurdum. Assume that $\sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers, and the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is irreducible, i.e., the numbers $m$ and $n$ have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

$3=\frac{m^2}{n^2}$ (1)

which is equivalent to $3n^2=m^2$ . From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number $m^2$ , and necessarily 3 must divide $m$ . Thus, $m=3p$ , where $p$ is a non negative integer.

Substituting $m=3p$ into (1), we get

$3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}$

which is equivalent to

$n^2=3p^2$ .

Thus, 3 divides $n^2$ and necessarily 3 must divide $n$ . Hence, $n=3q$ where $q$ is a non negative integer.

Notice that

$\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}$ .

The above equality means that the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, $r\in\mathbb{Q}$ , which is equivalent to say that $r=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers. Also, assume that $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ . So, we want to prove that $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}$ . Recall that an integer $k$ can be written as

$k=\frac{k}{1}$ .

Then,

$k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}$ .

Notice that the product $mk$ is an integer. Thus, the fraction $\frac{mk}{n}$ is a rational number. Therefore, $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

3. Let us prove by reductio ad absurdum that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have $x$ is irrational and $p\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

Write $q=x+p$ and let us suppose that $q$ is a rational number. So, we get that

$x=q-p$ .

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number $x$ must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, $x+p$ is irrational.

7 0

3 years ago