Answer:
The best solution.
Explanation:
In the operations and management of systems such as manufacturing, transport, government, network, service systems, we encounter various type of challenges and problems. These challenges and problems must be fixed or resolved as soon as possible in order to restore normal operations, as well as ensuring that the solution mitigates the occurrence of such problems in the future.
Hence, an optimal solution to an Operations problem will yield the best solution because it gives the maximum functionality. For instance, an optimal solution is considered to be the best solution because it gives the least cost, effective and efficient or gives the most profit.
Physical security is important because a physical attack is perhaps the most fundamental kind of attack. ... Using a floppy drive or CD-ROM drive on a machine that does not support good BIOS security. Damage to or theft of important machine components, especially those that store data. Theft of an entire machine
A belief is an attitude that something is the case, or that some proposition about the world is true.[1] In epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false.[2] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[2]
There are various different ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam).[2] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[2][3]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?"; "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?"; "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?"; and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?".[2]
Answer:
Binomial distribution:
Probability of being a student from Latvia,p=96/480=0.2
Probability of not being a student from Latvia,1-p=1-0.2=0.8
P(k>=3)=1-P(k<=2)
=1-(10C₀*0.20*0.810+10C₁*0.21*0.89+10C₂*0.22*0.88)
=1-(0.1074+0.2684+0.302)
=1-0.6778
=0.3222
Explanation: