A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Answer:
err
Explanation:
ff fd fd cjjjhss fsrt dsdygsx gdsryyf dsstg dssssss
The executive branch has the power to raise and support armies.
Answer:
Fugitive Slave Act
<h3>
What effect did the Fugitive Slave Act have?</h3>
- The law required citizens to help find slaves who had escaped, and if they refused or helped a fugitive escape, they could be fined and prosecuted.
- The act also made the federal government responsible for finding, returning, and trying escaped slaves.
- The Fugitive Slave Law. Hartford, Connecticut, 1850.
- This controversial law allowed slave hunters to seize alleged fugitive slaves without due process of law and prohibited anyone from aiding escaped fugitives or obstructing their recovery.
To learn more about it, refer
to brainly.com/question/26386481
#SPJ4
The answer is social control. This is especially true when we want to
ensure law and order in our society.
There are rules that are kept to prevent any kind of trouble. It does not suppress a person’s freedom
rather it protects individual freedom.
