What is the answer?? No links

Frank age 63 is single and provided all of the support for his daughter Anna age 24 and her son Marvin age 6. Neither Anna nor M

allsm [11]

Frank cannot claim Anna or Marvin as a dependent.

Explanation:

Because Frank gives Anna and Marvin every support, support tests are straightforward.

Anna earns revenue in excess of $4200 and can not therefore be requested as dependent. In fact, Marvin does not stay with Frank and can not therefore be stated as dependent.

The income tax credit, EITC or EIC is a bonus to low- and moderate-income employers. To apply, you must fulfill certain criteria and file a tax report, even if you are not obliged to pay a bill. The level of tax you pay is lowered by the EITC and a refund is probable.

3 0

3 years ago

Dudley Transport Company divides its operations into four divisions. A recent income statement for its West Division follows. DU

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Companywide income would increase by $6,000 if West Division is eliminated.

Explanation:

The amount by which the companywide income will increase or decrease if West Division is eliminated can be determined by comparing Revenue with avoidable cost.

Avoidable cost refers to the cost that will be eliminated or not incurred if a firm decides to change the course of a business.

In this question, avoidable cost is simply the cost or expenses that will be eliminated if West Division is eliminated.

Among all the expenses in the question, only Companywide facility-sustaining costs which is $78,000 cannot be eliminated if West Division is eliminated.

Therefore, avoidable cost can be calculated as follows:

Avoidable cost = Salaries for drivers + Fuel expenses + Insurance + Division-level facility-sustaining costs = 210,000 + 30,000 + 42,000 + 24,000 = $306,000

Since, Revenue = $300,000

Decision rule:

1. If revenue is greater than avoidable cost, we have a decrease in income. Therefore, the division should not be eliminated.

2. If revenue is less than avoidable cost, we have an increase in income. Therefore, the division should be eliminated.

Since the revenue of $300,000 is less than the avoidable cost of $306,000, it implies we have an increase in income based on the decision rule 2. The increase in income is calculated as follows:

Increase in income if West Division is eliminated = Avoidable cost – Revenue = $306,000 - $300,000 = $6,000

Therefore, companywide income would increase by $6,000 if West Division is eliminated

Since there would be an increase in income of $6,000, West Division should therefore be eliminated.

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose that two Japanese companies, Hitachi and Toshiba, are the sole producers (i.e., duopolists) of a microprocessor chip use

Dima020 [189]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

a) When both Hitachi and Toshiba engage in a limited campaign, they both earn $11 million.

If both engage in an extensive campaign they both earn $8 million.

However, if one firm engages in an extensive campaign and the other firm engages in a limited one, the firm engaging in a limited campaign earns $4 million while the one engaging in an extensive campaign earns $16 million.

I have attached a photo to show the payoff matrix as a table.

b) In the absence of a binding and enforceable agreement, that is to say that if both firms are not colluding, Hitachi's dominant strategy would be to engage in an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN.

A Firm's dominant strategy in absence of an agreement is that strategy that a firm can go on and make a maximum amount of profit regardless of what the other firm does.

Should Hitachi engage in an Extensive Campaign, they will make $16 million in quarterly profit if Toshiba engages in a Limited Campaign. Should Toshiba also decide to engage in an Extensive Campaign, then Hitachi makes a profit of $8 million. This is therefore their best alternative as opposed to embarking on a limited Campaign where there is a chance that they will make $4 million.

With the Extensive Campaign, Hitachi's Minimum Payoff is $8 million.

c) The game is the same for both players so the best option for Hitachi, is the best option for Toshiba as well. This means that Toshiba's dominant Strategy is an EXTENSIVE PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN and their minimum payoff is $8 million as well.

3 0

3 years ago

The following information pertains to Rik Co.'s two employees: Name Weekly salary Number of weeks worked in 2005 Vacation rights

Lapatulllka [165]

Answer: $1600

Explanation:

From the information given, it can be noted that while Ryan is vested, on the other hand, Todd isn't vested.

Therefore, since the vacation is for two weeks, the amount of vacation expense and liability should be reported will be for Ryan alone and this will be:

= $800 × 2

= $1600

In this case, service has already been rendered ans there's accumulated rights, therefore a vacation expense and liability of $1600 should be reported.

8 0

3 years ago

Zander Inc. uses a job-order costing system in which any underapplied or overapplied overhead is closed to cost of goods sold at

Margarita [4]

Answer:

Find attached complete question:

The correct option is A,$ 746,200

Explanation:

The total standard costs for the whole items of inventory completed in the month of July is the sum of the beginning balance of inventory plus direct materials costs, direct labor cost as well as manufacturing overhead cost applied.

Total cost of completed units=$44,100+$564,900+$195,300+$315,000=$ 1,119,300.00

standard cost per unit=$1,119,300.00/21000=$53.3

Cost of goods sold(unadjusted)=$53.3 *14,000=$ 746,200.00

6 0

3 years ago