Answer/Explanation:
An irrigation system represents a stable food supply because it is how they controlled water to be able to plant crops. A second most important artifact that is in the category of stable food supply is the plow. Agriculture produced enough food that people became free to pursue interests other than worrying about what they were going to eat that day.
Answer:
Dakara watashi wa sore ga tada no orokana pankudearu koto o ki ni shimasen! !
Explanation:
Watashi wa sono orokamono o kinishinai! !
A main difference between the United States Constitution and state constitutions are that state constitutions are subservient to the U.S. Constitution and can only outline powers which are allowed to states by the U.S. Constitution. States cannot enumerate for itself powers that are not allowed to the state by the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, the U.S. Constitution is the highest law of the land and cannot be changed or adapted as a result of a state constitution.
Inside its beak, an octopus has a rasping tongue that is used to tear apart food. It is analogous to <u>Radula.</u>
The radula, part of the odontophore, may be protruded, and it's far utilized in drilling holes in prey or in rasping meals debris from a floor. it is supported through a cartilage-like mass (the odontophore) and is covered with rows of many small teeth (denticles).
The radula is the organ for mechanical food processing and a crucial autapomorphy of Mollusca. Its chitinous membrane, embedding small radular teeth, is moved with the aid of the set of muscle groups resulting in an interplay with the ingesta, tearing it and amassing loosened particles.
The radula is a file-like rasping organ with transverse rows of chitinous teeth present in the buccal hollow space of many mollusks. it's miles used for scraping or cutting food before it enters the stomach. it is ribbon-like and corresponds to the tongue.
Learn more about Radula<u> </u>here
brainly.com/question/10442363
#SPJ4
The answer to this question is <span>when two variables are correlated, we cannot be sure what is causing the correlation.
For example, let's there is a study that found an increase in consumption in tofu lead to an increase in breast cancer.
Even if it's true that those two really correlated (let's just assume it), we wouldn't be able to know why it is correlated without further researches.</span>
