Answer:
The correct answer is option (b).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
first we calculate the predetermined OH, then
Predetermined OH rate = Estimated Manufacturing OH Cost ÷ Estimated Direct Labor Hours
= $451,140 ÷ 61,800
= 7.3
So, Applied MOH = 60,500 × 7.3 = $441,650
So, Underapplied OH = Actual MOH - Applied MOH
= $532,000 - $441,650
= $90,350 (under applied)
The court would rule in sue's favor because courts seldom inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
In contracts, <em>consideration </em>just means the <em>exchange of things of value</em>. There has to be an exchange of things of value for there to be an enforceable contract, and in this case a watch was exchanged for money. It is rare for courts to rule on how much consideration is expected because people are generally free to set their own prices and not sell if the price is too low. That is not for a court to decide (in most cases).
Answer:
E) Market Exchange
Explanation:
Market exchange refers to at least two people or firms trading one good or service for another. In this case, the theater group is trading a free show and other promotional activities (standup comedy nights, and volunteer work) in exchange for higher membership to their group or higher attendance to their shows.
A trade does not necessarily imply a money exchange, it can also include goods or services that provide utility for the other party. For example, an increase in group membership will help the theater group perform better.
<span>creating an inventory of data contained in the database.</span>
Answer:tortious interference
Explanation:
tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.
