Given the compound statement <span>(p∨q)∧r
where: p: 5 < -3
q : All vertical angles are congruent.
r: 4x = 36, then x = 9.
Recall the in logic, '</span>∨' symbolises "or" while '∧' symbolises "and".
Therefore, the compound statement <span>(p∨q)∧r can be written as follows:
Either 5 < -3 or all vertical angles are congruent, and if 4x = 36, then x = 9.
</span>
These are two questions and two answers.
1) Problem 17.
(i) Determine whether T is continuous at 6061.
For that you have to compute the value of T at 6061 and the lateral limits of T when x approaches 6061.
a) T(x) = 0.10x if 0 < x ≤ 6061
T (6061) = 0.10(6061) = 606.1
b) limit of Tx when x → 6061.
By the left the limit is the same value of T(x) calculated above.
By the right the limit is calculated using the definition of the function for the next stage: T(x) = 606.10 + 0.18 (x - 6061)
⇒ Limit of T(x) when x → 6061 from the right = 606.10 + 0.18 (6061 - 6061) = 606.10
Since both limits and the value of the function are the same, T is continuous at 6061.
(ii) Determine whether T is continuous at 32,473.
Same procedure.
a) Value at 32,473
T(32,473) = 606.10 + 0.18 (32,473 - 6061) = 5,360.26
b) Limit of T(x) when x → 32,473 from the right
Limit = 5360.26 + 0.26(x - 32,473) = 5360.26
Again, since the two limits and the value of the function have the same value the function is continuos at the x = 32,473.
(iii) If T had discontinuities, a tax payer that earns an amount very close to the discontinuity can easily approach its incomes to take andvantage of the part that results in lower tax.
2) Problem 18.
a) Statement Sk
You just need to replace n for k:
Sk = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) = k(3k - 1) / 2
b) Statement S (k+1)
Replace
S(k+1) = 1 + 4 + 7 + ... (3k - 2) + [ 3 (k + 1) - 2 ] = (k+1) [ 3(k+1) - 1] / 2
Simplification:
1 + 4 + 7 + ... + 3k - 2+ 3k + 3 - 2] = (k + 1) (3k + 3 - 1)/2
k(3k - 1)/ 2 + (3k + 1) = (k + 1)(3k+2) / 2
Do the operations on the left side and you will find it can be simplified to k ( 3k +1) (3 k + 2) / 2.
With that you find that the left side equals the right side which is a proof of the validity of the statement by induction.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1)x/4.1=-2
2)multiplyby 4.1 on both sides x/4.1*4.1=-2*4.1
3) x=-8.2
Probably 50. because there are two sides to the coin. 100/2=50.
Answer:
Let x be the number of regular health bars you buy and y the number of strawberry health bars you buy. Then:
0.75x+1.25y=3.75
x+y>=3
Step-by-step explanation:
For the first equation, we have to assume that you will spend all of your money, otherwise it becomes an inequation. The money you spend on regular bars is 0.75x dollars and the money you spend on strawberry bars is 1.25y, so if you spend your 3.75 dollars on the bars, then 0.75x+1.25y=3.75.
For the second, you will always buy x+y health bars, regular and strawberry. There isn't enough information to make this into a equation, the only thing we can deduce is the inequation x+y>=3.
If we also assume that x and y are integers (we can't buy half-bars or one-fourth of a bar) then the minimum number of bars we can buy is 3 (3 strawberry bars) and the maximum is 5 bars (5 regular bars). x+y must be an integer too, so the possibilities for the second equation are x+y=3, x+y=4 and x+y=5. There is a finite number of solutions in any case.
