Area of bottom rectangle:-
Area of rectangle above it:-
Area of rectangle above it
Area of triangle:-
Total:-
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Answer:
Put the equation in standard form by bringing the 4x + 1 to the left side.
7x2 - 4x - 1 = 0
We use the discriminant to determine the nature of the roots of a quadratic equation. The discriminant is the expression underneath the radical in the quadratic formula: b2 - 4ac.
b2 - 4ac In this case, a = 7, b = -4, and c = -1
(-4)2 - 4(7)(-1)
16 + 28 = 44
Now here are the rules for determining the nature of the roots:
(1) If the discriminant = 0, then there is one real root (this omits the ± from the quadratic formula, leaving only one possible solution)
(2) If the discriminant > 0, then there are two real roots (this keeps the ±, giving you two solutions)
(3) If the discriminant < 0, then there are two imaginary roots (this means there is a negative under the radical, making the solutions imaginary)
44 > 0, so there are two real roots
The answer would still be 3. Nothing changes