All categories

3 years ago

!!20 points and Brainliest please help!!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

vitfil [10]3 years ago

7 0

D) ac + ad + bc + bd

Hope it helps :)

Bad White [126]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

D) ac + ad + bc + bd

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

A manufacturer of chocolate candies uses machines to package candies as they move along a filling line. Although the packages ar

Elenna [48]

Answer:

We conclude that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a particular sample of 50 packages, the mean amount dispensed is 8.171 ounces, with a sample standard deviation of 0.052 ounces.

Let $\mu$ = population mean amount packaged.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu$ = 8.17 ounces {means that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu\neq$ 8.17 ounces {means that the mean amount packaged is different from 8.17 ounces}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about the population standard deviation;

T.S. = $\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }$ ~ $t_n_-_1$

where, $\bar X$ = sample mean amount dispensed = 8.171 ounces

s = sample standard deviation = 0.052 ounces

n = sample of packages = 50

So, the test statistics = $\frac{8.171-8.17}{\frac{0.052}{\sqrt{50} } }$ ~ $t_4_9$

= 0.1359

The value of t-test statistics is 0.1359.

Also, the P-value of test-statistics is given by;

the meaning of the p-value is that the p-value is the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is equal to or more extreme than 0.001 ounces away from8.17 if the null hypothesis is true.

P-value = P( $t_4_9$ > 0.136) = More than 40% {from the t-table}

Since the P-value of our test statistics is more than the level of significance of 0.01, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces.

6 0

3 years ago

Felix is now six times as old as Debbie. In twelve years time Felix will be two times as old as Debbie. How old are they

Minchanka [31]

Step-by-step explanation:

let debbie be x years

let felix be 6x years

in 12 years felix will be 2x older than debbie

do the calc

6 0

3 years ago

Is it true that the integral LaTeX: \int x^2e^{2x}dx ∫ x 2 e 2 x d x can be evaluated using integration by parts? If so, state t

Marysya12 [62]

Answer:

Yes the integral can be evaluated by integration by parts as solved below.

Step-by-step explanation:

$\int x^{2}e^{2x}dx$

Taking algebraic function as first function and exponential function as second function we have

$\int x^{2}e^{2x}dx=x^{2}\int e^{2x}dx-\int (x^{2})'\int e^{2x}dx\\\\=x^{2}\frac{e^{2x}}{2}-\int 2x\times \frac{e^{2x}}{2}dx\\\\\frac{x^{2}e^{2x}}{2}-\int xe^{2x}dx\\\\Now\\\\\int xe^{2x}dx=x\int e^{2x}dx-\int 1\cdot \int e^{2x}dx\\\\=\frac{xe^{2x}}{2}-\int \frac{e^{2x}}{2}dx\\\\\frac{xe^{2x}}{2}-\frac{e^{2x}}{4}\\\\\therefore \int x^{2}e^{2x}dx=\frac{x^{2}e^{2x}}{2}-\frac{xe^{2x}}{2}+\frac{e^{2x}}{4}$

5 0

3 years ago

I need help please help me

Viktor [21]

(Scroll to the bottom to see my answer) The order of operations is PEMDAS aka Parentheses. Exponents. Multiplication or Division (Which ever come first). Addition or Subtraction (again whichever comes first). Start with (12-9)=3 then multiply 3 by 3, three times=9 then multiply 2 and 7 together=14 then do 9-14=-5

So my final answer is -5! I might be wrong but I did my best! I hope I’m not too late!

4 0

3 years ago

PLS HURRY IM BEING TIMED

xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I think it's A because that how many miles shes walking not hours not secound or minutes miles. Sry if i'm wrong.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers