Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
To acquire approval to conduct an experiment with subjects from her undergraduate psychology course, a student researcher needs to submit an application to the university's institutional review board.
The purpose of the institutional review board review is to make sure that the appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of subjects who are engaging in research, both beforehand and via ongoing assessment. Institutional review boards (IRBs) are tasked with reviewing all research involving human beings in order to protect their rights and welfare.
According to 45 CFR 46.103, the Institutional review boards must assess and approve any non-exempt human subject study. The researcher might not be allowed to use the data and other material gathered throughout the research process if the Institutional review board's permission was not obtained prior to performing the study.
Learn more about institutional review board:
brainly.com/question/5142341
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. subordinated the family to the state.
Explanation:
From the eighth century onwards, Sparta became the state with the greatest military force in Greece. It had a political system of dual kings and an educational system designed to produce only warriors. The Spartan state and its system of state slaves were designed to facilitate and support the military domain of Sparta.
