Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
1. Commutative property of adfition
2. Multiplicative inverse
3. Associative property of addition
4. Distributive property
5. Additive identity
<span>According the information given we understand that the room is a regular rectangle, We know that volume = lenght * widht * height, so we start by calculate the room area as length by width, that is 16.4 * 4.5 = 73.8 square metres. Then with 3.26 metres of height, the total volum will 73.8 * 3.26 = 240.58 cubic metres.</span>
8 divided by 4 = 2
So two is your answer