Answer:
B) The excitement of the accident and the speedy response of the rescuer would be considered in a case such as this.
Explanation:
D) is incorrect; the driver would have a defense if he could demonstrate that the rescuer's actions were reckless.
(A) is incorrect because, while the court can conclude that the rescuer recklessly put himself in danger, this is not an absolute defense.
(C) is an incorrect statement of law; assumption of risk may be applicable, depending on the circumstances, such as if the rescue were reckless.
Answer:
I believe the answer is Cuba
Explanation:
US government-funded Freedom House classifies Cuba as being "Not Free", and notes that "Cuba is the only country in the Americas that consistently makes Freedom House's list of the Worst of the Worst: the World's Most Repressive Societies for widespread abuses of political rights and civil liberties."
Answer:
<u>C) Prima Facie evidence</u>
Explanation:
Prima Facie evidence is a legal term used for irrefutable proof, in which case you have sufficient evidence before the trial to prove the case.
It is something assumed to be true unless substantial opposing evidence is presented on trial by the defense.
Answer:
South Vietnam
Explanation:
I just got it right on USATESTPREP
