In this statement, Maslow is arguing that not all of our needs are equally important. Some needs, such as food or thirst, are our priority, and only when we satisfy these do we begin to think about others such as love and self-esteem.
An example that shows this are people who live in extreme poverty and steal food. People in this situation would rather compromise their safety, freedom and maybe even self-worth in order to satisfy their hunger.
However, some evidence points to the opposite as well. For example, soldiers who join the war do so to fulfill abstract needs such as earning respect and finding meaning, even if this means risking their safety, having little to eat and facing many uncomfortable situations. Another example is athletes. Athletes train to a degree that is uncomfortable and hard. They also limit their food intake to certain types of food in order to achieve goals such as self-fulfillment and a higher self-esteem.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments<span> to this </span>Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposingamendments<span>, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes</span>
Sounds like rule of law to me. the rule of law states that everyone no matter what are held accountable to the same law. and trump was being held to the same law as any normal citizen here. hope that helped somewhat! :)
Answer:
Social problems are usually present constantly, making it difficult to mark change.
Explanation:
Simply put, a social problem is any condition which affects a large number of people and is usually negative.
Therefore, the BEST Explanation as to why it can be harder to have an issue that impacts those in the lower realms of society defined as a social problem is that social problems are usually present constantly, making it difficult to mark change.
