No. Because sides JM and KL have different slopes from sides AD and BC .
The formula of a slope:
For AD:
We have the points A(2, -2) and D(1, -4). Substitute:
For JM:
We have the points J(4, -4) and M(2, -9). Substitute:
----------------------------------------
Another argument.
No. Because the MJ is not twice as long as AD.
The formula of the length of a segment:
The length of AD:
The length of MJ:
Alright, so for AB and CD to be parallel, CX and DX would have to be equal, as is with AX and BX. In addition, for CD and AB to be parallel, all sides in both triangles are either equal or not all sides in even one triangle are equal. Therefore, CD is not 3. In addition, two sides of a triangle combined must be greater than the third, so that leaves 5, 4, and 2 for CD. If it was 5, that would mean that all sides are equal, so that leaves 4 and 2. However, I don't see anything to prove either one right, sorry:/
Answer:
<em>How much is her raise?</em>
Her raise is at 0.345$
<em>Hourly pay after raise?</em>
Her new pay rate is 11.845$/h
Step-by-step explanation:
New hourly pay:
Actual raise:
Answer:
4.5454545454545454. . .
Step-by-step explanation:
Original equation:
2500 + 110h < 3000
Subtract 2500 from both sides
110h < 500
Divide both sides by 110
h < 4.5 (rounded to the nearest tenth)
Hope this helps :)
Please consider Brainliest :)