It means the personal freedom to follow whatever religion you choose, or
NO religion if that's your choice, in any way you want as long as you don't
bother other people, without any interference from laws or other people,
and without any penalty or discrimination no matter what your choice is.
That seems like such common sense that it's hard to understand that
in huge parts of the world, that's not the way it is at all.
Hi, I hope I am able to help you.
What does Canada's constitution say about the people of Canada?
A.) Every citizen <em>must</em> own a car
B.) Every citizen has<em> </em>basic rights and freedoms
C.) Every citizen has to serve in the military
D.) Every citizen must go to college
I would say the answer is B.) Every citizen has<em> </em>basic rights and freedoms.
The term that could be best described as the way that Kevin is thinking is a social comparison. Social comparison is being defined as a way of individual's determine his or her social worth in which could be based from how the person stack against other people in which we could see how Kevin felt better after finding out that Samantha was struggling more than him.
The answer is D) Presence of limited resources in the organization.
The reason being that when there are limited resources in the organization this causes every employee or individual in said organization to desire the posession of optimum resources. This logically increases the level of political engagement in order to get the maximum advantage of the resources and their distribution.
Hope this helps :)
