Answer:
<u>The Red Herring fallacy</u>
Explanation:
A fallacy is an unsound or misleading argument. There are many types of fallacies, the one that Tom uses is the Red Herring fallacy. This one consists of including an irrelevant issue in an argument in order to mislead and distract the audience from the real issue and abandon it. When Tom mentions that he is a member of the baseball team and that he goes to church regularly, he is adding irrelevant information on the real issue, which it's to prove why texting while driving should not be made illegal. This way, Tom aims to distract his audience from the real topic and abandon the original argument.
Answer:
B- RETAILER AND WHOLESALER BEHAVIOUR
Explanation:
Behavioral segmentation maybe based on retailer and wholesaler behaviour because it divide the total market into smaller homogeneous groups based on customer behavior. Behavioral segmentation is done by organizations, company or business owner on the basis of buying patterns of customers like brand loyalty.
Behavioral segmentation is the process of analyzing your customer or retailer actions and using it to make personalized experiences.
Behavioral segmentation divides consumers or retailers according to behavior patterns as they interact with an organisation or company.
Sight: "green plantains / hanging in stalks"
Sound: "listening to the Puerto Ricans complain"
Smell: "smells from the open bids / of dried codfish"
Answer:
The best response of the options provided is Option B: Conflict theory.
Explanation:
The best choice of the options provided is conflict theory because conflict theorists take a critical stance toward existing social arrangements like the way that illness is defined. This can affect the access that people without power have to services or to livelihood, if the way that the powerful define illness works to their disadvantage in some way. An example would be denying someone disability status because their condition is not recognized as an illness that can affect productivity. This could make it so the person who is less powerful has to continue working despite their illness or disability and it may deny them benefits.