1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FromTheMoon [43]
2 years ago
15

Mathilda adds up all the natural numbers from 1 to 10 and obtains a sum of S. Then she adds up 3 odd numbers between 1 and 10 an

d gets a sum of s. Which of the following could not be the value of S - s? HELP ASAP ILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER. NO USING LINKS OR PDF OR USING FOR POINTS OR ELSE ILL REPORT U
A. 32
B. 36
C. 34
D. 40
E. 38
Mathematics
2 answers:
Mekhanik [1.2K]2 years ago
5 0
The answer is B). 36
bija089 [108]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. 32

Step-by-step explanation:

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10=55

55-32=23

55-36=19--can

55-34=21--can

55-40=15--can

55-38=17--can

combo of 3

1,3,5=9

137=11

139=13

157=13

159=15

179=17

357=15

359=17

379=19

579=21

You might be interested in
Is the Mandelbrot set locally connected?
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is conjectured that the Mandelbrot set is locally connected. This famous conjecture is known as MLC (for Mandelbrot locally connected). By the work of Adrien Douady and John H. Hubbard, this conjecture would result in a simple abstract "pinched disk" model of the Mandelbrot set. In particular, it would imply the important hyperbolicity conjecture mentioned above.

The work of Jean-Christophe Yoccoz established local connectivity of the Mandelbrot set at all finitely renormalizable parameters; that is, roughly speaking those contained only in finitely many small Mandelbrot copies.[19] Since then, local connectivity has been proved at many other points of {\displaystyle M}M, but the full conjecture is still open.

5 0
3 years ago
The answer to a division problem is greater than the divisor always never or sometimes pick one
Ksenya-84 [330]
Sometimes..... 
hope this helps! :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 158% of 200?
Amanda [17]
You would do 200 times 1.58 and that gets you 316 hope this helps :)
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When dividing 82 by 43, Linda estimated the quotient to be 2. Examine Linda’s work, and explain what
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

82/43 = 1 and 39/43

Step-by-step explanation:

When dividing 82 by 43 , the operation follows;

82/43 = 1 and 39/43

This means the quotient is 1 and reminder is 39

However;

82/43 = 1.907 ------nearest whole number is 2.

so the quotient can be approximated to the nearest whole number as 2.

8 0
2 years ago
Mina asked four friends to explain how each one solved the expression . Here are their explanations:
Fed [463]

Ok let me answer this question by finding it's solution first.

The two numbers are 15.75 and 176.3

First we will compare the numbers.

1. A=176.3

2. B=15.75

one's place of A is greater than once place of B.

tens place of A is greater than tens place of B.

Hundred place of A is greater than hundred place of B.

So, A>B

So  we will subtract 15.75 from 176.3.

176.30 -15.75=

176.30     ----A

- 1 5.75     ----B

Hundreths place of A - Hundreths place of B =  0-5=10-5=5

Tenth place of A  - Tenth place of B =12-7=5

ones place of A - ones place of B=5-5=0

Tens place of A - Tens place of B =7-1=6

Leave 1 as it is.

So the solution is 160.55

Now coming back to the Explanation by four friends of Mina

Ivy’s explanation: I lined up the numbers to subtract. [As i have explained above you have to find first which number is bigger , then first you must write bigger number then if the bigger number has  only tenth place value mark hundred place as 0 and then start subtracting from Right to left.]

Hannah’s explanation: I lined up the two decimals according to place value. I put a 0 in the hundredths place to make it easier for me to subtract.   [ As i said above first you have to choose which number is bigger then you can proceed as you have done.]

Jose’s explanation: I lined up the two decimals according to place value   [ Jose you have made same mistake, first find which number is bigger then line up the number according to their place value, write the bigger number first then start subtracting as i have explained above.]

An’s explanation: I counted up from 15.75 to 176.3 to find the difference. I underlined each number I added on each line.   [ Too lengthy and very time consuming. Use the method as i have explined above.]




6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can some one plzzz helps me with this
    12·1 answer
  • The function h(x)= 12x^8+49 is an even function. Which transformation of h(x) would result in a function that is neither even no
    7·1 answer
  • Last month sue made $200 by baby-sitting for 12 hours and tutoring for 20 hours. This month she worked the same number of hours
    13·2 answers
  • Hannah and anthony are siblings who have ages that are consecutive odd integers. The sum of there ages is 92. Which equations co
    5·1 answer
  • What is the answer if you factor completely
    12·1 answer
  • What is the algebraic expression for "the difference between eleven times a number and four"?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these segments could be the image of segment AB after a sequence of reflections, rotations, and/or translations? ​
    6·1 answer
  • Which graph is a function, and explain how you knew whether each graph was a function or not.
    8·1 answer
  • A bag with 12 marbles has 5 blue marbles, 3 yellow marbles, and 4 red marbles. A marble is chosen from the bag at random. What i
    13·1 answer
  • What can be concluded if <1≈ <7?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!