They had what they needed and nothing more they thought that they did not need huge empires
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
Answer:
<em>A.The climate of Kush was more pleasant.
</em>
Explanation:
<em>The land in Kush was more fertile. The climate of Kush was more pleasant. There were many gold mines in Kush</em>
Answer:
C).
Explanation:
The Council of Nicea was very important for the history of Christendom as it established an uniformed conception about the divine nature of Jesus as Son of God and its role into the Trinity. Also, the Council created the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed wich is one of the foundations of the Christian faith. This creed is fundamental in the origin of the set of Catholic beliefs.
