Answer: The third option (option C) is the right answer.
Explanation:
The paragraph which has the best coherence is option C. This is because in the case of the third option, it explains that the flow of ideas is constant from one sentence to another.
The first sentence serves as an introduction which talked about the reasons why duties should be divided based on each member’s expertise. The sentences moved smoothly and also logically from one sentence to another sentence. An example is the sentence that “if your company does not have a public relations executive…..”. This should logically proceed the sentence that says that communication ought to be overseen by the director of PR.
This shows that the third option possesses a consistent and logical train of thought as well.
Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) is a police officer-led arrangement of classroom exercises that shows kids (normally in rudimentary or center school) how to remain tranquilize free and oppose peer weight.
According to Rosenbaum and Hanson (1998), D.A.R.E has no critical in general effect on utilizing cigarettes or liquor
They concluded that, Given the tremendous uses in time and cash required with D.A.R.E., no doubt proceeded with endeavors should center around different systems and projects that may deliver more significant impacts.
Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
Answer: Esther does not recognize any gain or loss on the distribution and her remaining basis in EE is $15,000
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, repayment of liabilities is treated as a cash distribution. Esther's share of the debt reduction is Since this amount is lower than her outside basis ($40,000) she does not recognize a gain or loss.reduces her outside basis by the $25,000, which leaves her $15,000 of outside basis in EE afterthe debt repayment.
Answer: $12,113.14
Explanation:
Find out the future value of each payment 20 years from now then sum up the values.
Year 1:
= 250 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁹
= $3,557.94
Year 2:
= 300 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁸
= $3,712.636
Year 3:
= 450 * ( 1 + 15%)¹⁷
= $4,842.5688
Future value of all:
= 3,557.94 + 3,712.636 + 4,842.5688
= $12,113.14
