All categories

3 years ago

What is an example of secondary data?

Business

1 answer:

Veronika [31]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

The answer is Option B "an interview." Secondary data is data coming from someone else who isn't the researcher a good example of secondary data would be a interview. A interview the researcher is asking a person for data on the subject and they give their point of view/opinion on it.

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

When museums charge a lower admission fee to students and senior citizens, this form of pricing is known as ________. third-degr

stellarik [79]

<span>When museums charge a lower admission fee to students and senior citizens, this form of pricing is known as price discrimination.

Price discrimination is a way of changing the prices for something based on time of day, amounts sold, or who they are sold to. This type of discrimination is done to try and maximize profits in the largest way possible. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If during the year the portfolio manager sells all of the holdings of stock D and replaces it with 150,000 shares of stock E at

eimsori [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is 30.10%.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:

Stock A price = $30

Value of stock A = $30 × 210,000 = $6,300,000

Stock B price = $35

Value of stock B = $35 × 310,000 = $10,850,000

Stock C price = $10

Value of stock C = $10 × 410,000 = $4,100,000

Stock D price = $15

Value of stock D = $15 × 610,000 = $9,150,000

So, We can calculate the portfolio turnover rate by using following formula:

Portfolio turnover rate = Value of stocks sold or purchase / Market Value of Assets

Where, Market Value of Assets = Value of stock A + Value of stock B +Value of stock C + Value of stock D

= $6,300,000 + $10,850,000 + $4,100,000 + $9,150,000

= $30,400,000

And Value of stock sold = value of stock D = $9,150,000

So, by putting the following values in the formula:

= Turnover Rate = 9,150,000 / 30,400,000

= 30.10%

Hence, the portfolio turnover rate is 30.10%.

7 0

3 years ago

Pearl Corporation issued 1,700 $1,000 bonds at 103. Each bond was issued with one detachable stock warrant. After issuance, the

arlik [135]

Answer:

Solution as seen below

Explanation:

Bond = 1,700 × $1,000 × 98%

= $1,666,000

Allocation :

Issue price $1,751,000

(1,700 × $1,000 × 103%)

Bonds ( $1,666,000 )

Warrants $85,000

($1,751,000 - $1,666,000)

Bond face value $1,700,000

(1,700 × $1,000)

Allocated FMV ($1,666,000)

Discounts $34,000

($1,700,000 - $1,666,000)

7 0

3 years ago

Which best describes the purpose of using cost-benefit analysis?

IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

Make decisions that maximize benefits

Explanation:

The whole purpose of a cost-benefit analysis is to allow management to make the best decisions using the measurment of profitability in a specific project or system. The model calculates all the income and benefits as well as all the associated costs, substracting the costs from the benefits. This is how you can determine the opportunity cost for each project or system.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Farrokh and Scheherezade Sharabianlou agreed to buy a building owned by Berenstein Associates for $2 million. They deposited $11

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.

Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.

The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.

The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.

If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.

6 0

3 years ago