Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Hi!
A perfect square is the product of when a whole number is multiplied by itself
Ex:
6 × 6 = 36, 36 is the perfect square.
The number that is being multiplied is the square root.
So to find the correct answer for this question, let's use the process of elimination.
100 = 10 × 10 so we can cross out 100
64 = 8 × 8 so we can cross out 64
25 = 5 × 5 so we can cross out 25
Now all we have left is 24, which is not a perfect square.
Answer: A. 24
Hope this helps :)
A is the correct answer 3 terms and a degree of 9:)
So you add 7 every time so,
28+7=34
34+7=41
if he continues his pattern he will have done 41 sit-ups on Friday
Your answer would be 46.50 because you would divide 31 in half (for the 50%) then add that to the 31. So 31+15.50= $46.50 hope this helps. If not let me know
