Answer: C) It is a dependent clause.
Explanation: an independent clause is a sentence that has complete meaning on its own (it has at least a subject, a verb and all the necessary complements), a dependent clause is the contrary, is a phrase that, in order to make sense, it needs to be with an independent clause. The given excerpt is a clear example of a dependent clause, because as we can see, it doesn't have complete sense, we can tell that it is missing something.
Do you need help with the directions, or actually doing the assignment?
What taste better than i smell
After analyzing the options containing different parts of a book, we can say that the author would explain why she wrote that book in:
A. The introduction
<h3>The different parts of a book</h3>
First, it is important to understand that the correct place to explain the central idea of a book and why you have written it is in the preface. However, preface is not one of the answer options provided.
For that reason, we will choose introduction, and here is why:
- A foreword is written by someone else, not the author.
- The index is just a list of keywords organized alphabetically.
- The table of contents is a list of chapters and page numbers.
With that in mind, the only good option to answer this question is B. introduction. This is where the author will present her ideas to readers.
Learn more about introductions here:
brainly.com/question/1047087
The Maasai are thought of as the typical cattle herders of Africa, yet they have not always been herders, nor are they all today. Because of population growth, development strategies, and the resulting shortage of land, cattle raising is in decline. However, cattle still represent "the breath of life" for many Maasai. When given the chance, they choose herding above all other livelihoods. For many Westerners, the Maasai are Hollywood's "noble savage"—fierce, proud, handsome, graceful of bearing, and elegantly tall. Hair smeared red with ochre (a pigment), they either carry spears or stand on one foot tending cattle. These depictions oversimplify Maasai life during the twentieth century. Today, Maasai cattle herders may also be growing maize (corn) or wheat, rearing Guinea fowl, raising ostriches, or may be hired by ecologists to take pictures of the countryside.
Prior to British colonization, Africans, Arabs, and European explorers considered the Maasai formidable warriors for their conquests of neighboring peoples and their resistance to slavery. Caravan traders traveling from the coast to Uganda crossed Maasailandwith trepidation. However, in 1880–81, when the British unintentionally introduced rinderpest (a cattle disease), the Maasai lost 80 percent of their stock. The British colonizers further disrupted Maasai life by moving them to a reserve in southern Kenya. While the British encouraged them to adopt European ways, they also advised them to retain their traditions. These contradictions resulted, for the most part, in leaving the Maasai alone and allowed them to develop almost on their own. However, drought, famine, cattle diseases, and intratribal warfare (warfare among themselves) in the nineteenth century greatly weakened the Maasai and nearly destrtoyed certain tribes.
<span>
Read more: <span>http://www.everyculture.com/wc/Tajikistan-to-Zimbabwe/Maasai.html#ixzz4lDPcYFKL</span></span>
