Answer:
Voluntary consent:
In the current case there exists an absence of the voluntary consent with respect to Mr Jerome because of over the top impact and coercion. Mr Jerome relies totally upon Mr Philip because of which the last could impact him. Mr Jerome can show that he didn't genuinely consent to the agreement so he can either hold fast to the agreement or pull back. Mr Philip had a great deal of impact over the old Mr Jerome and consequently could beat his free will. Under the current conditions the agreement was gone into under an excessive amount of impact and is voidable.
Answer:
$20,670
Explanation:
Firm A Firm B
Actual Dumping 157 183
Pollution Permits Allotted <u> 11 </u> <u> 11 </u>
Reduction Required 146 172
Cost of Dumping 1 ton $160 $65
As the cost of dumping to Firm A is $160 which is higher than the marginal cost of dumping of Firm B which is $65, so it is better that Firm B take benefit from it by selling it at $65. So now total tons require dumping is 318 tons (146 + 172).
Total cost of reducing pollution = 318 tons * $65 = $20,670
Answer:
Explanation:
In this statement, Kendall is an active follower because he pushes himself in his work and tries to provide as much value to his employer as possible. This includes giving ideas, perfecting his work, and even going above and beyond by doing tasks that are not part of the job description to simply help out. On the other hand, Cora is a conformist because she follows orders exactly as they are given regardless of whether they are unethical or may cause problems with the other co-workers.
Answer:
Option "C" is correct.
Explanation:
Option "c" is correct because companies are facing difficulties in the recruitment of workers which exhibits that few workers are available in the market. That means the company does not have enough options regarding the workers so it finds difficulty in the recruitment. Moreover, the availability of few workers means unemployment is very low.