Answer:
right to information denotes the right to request and obtain information of public or individual importance held in public agencies.
Explanation:
hope it helps!!plz mark as brainleist.
This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
The goal of philosophy is: A. to pursue truth.
<h3>What is philosophy?</h3>
Philosophy can be defined as a systematized study of general and fundamental nature of reality, existence, and questions, such as those about mind, knowledge, ethics, existence, true, right and wrong, reasoning, values, and language.
<h3>The pillars of philosophy.</h3>
Basically, there are different types of philosophy and these include the following:
- Theoretical philosophy (metaphysics and epistemology).
- Practical philosophy (social, ethics, and political philosophy, and aesthetics).
In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the goal of philosophy is to pursue truth.
Read more on philosophy here: brainly.com/question/681337
#SPJ1
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
<span>In the mayor council government, the city council is the legislative body, while the mayor is the city's chief executive officer. In this government they have a weak mayor plan, which limits the power of the mayor and gives more power to the city council, and the strong-mayor plan, which gives more power to the mayor and less to the city council. In this type of government city council members and mayors are usually elected. The council-manager government is a commission with a city manager. Voters elect a city council. The council then appoints a city manager. The city manager then appoints the heads of city departments. They are the same because in both they elect a city council.
</span>I hope this helps, if you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. If it is no trouble, would you also be so kind as to mark this response as the brainliest?
