1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inga [223]
3 years ago
12

What is 1+1??????????

Mathematics
2 answers:
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

2??????????????

Step-by-step explanation:

i think

LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
5 0
Answer: 2

Hardest thing I have seen all day.
Have a great day/night
Hope this helps
You might be interested in
I will give brainlist!
Ilya [14]

Answer:

The length of x is 4

Step-by-step explanation:

The scale factor is Large/small where 10/8 which is DF/AC.

THE SCALE factor is 5/4.

To find the length of X is in AB we use the scale factor 5/4 and the corresponding DE.

5/4 = DE/AB

5/4 = 5/X

X = 4

To find Y in EF will use the corresponding BC which is 6.

5/4 = EF/BC

5/4 = Y/6

Y= 7.5

info: use CORRESPONDING ABC AND DEF .

3 0
3 years ago
A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>The complete question is</u>: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let p_1 = <u><em>proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards</em></u>.

p_2 = <u><em>proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards</em></u>.

SO, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1 \geq p_2     {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1 < p_2     {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>Two-sample z-test for</u> <u>proportions</u>;

                         T.S. =  \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = \frac{200}{1000} = 0.20

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = \frac{168}{800} = 0.21

n_1 = sample of Republicans = 1000

n_2 = sample of Democrats = 800

So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.20-0.21)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{1000}+\frac{0.21(1-0.21)}{800} } }

                                     =  -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

<u>Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula; </u>

            P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z \leq 0.52)

                          = 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which <em><u>we fail to reject our null hypothesis</u></em>.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

7 0
3 years ago
A company surveyed 1000 people on their age and the number of jeans purchased annually. The results of the poll are shown in the
Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

a) 0.437; b) 0.291

Step-by-step explanation:

For part a,

There are 280+210 = 490 people that are over 18 years old.  Out of these, 119+95 = 214 purchase 2 pairs of jeans annually.  This is

214/490 ≈ 0.437

For part b,

There are 87+69+74+11 = 241 people who purchase 3 or more pairs of jeans.  There were a total of 220+290+280+210 = 1000 people; this means there were 759 people tho purchased fewer than 3 pairs of jeans.  

Out of these, 21+74+126 = 221 were in the age group 12-18.  This gives us

221/759 ≈ 0.291

8 0
3 years ago
I need help Please!! 1-4 Please I will Brainliest Please Help!!
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

1. $3

2. $14

3. 44

4. 1693

Brainliest please

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write an inequality to represent the real-world problem. Then explain how you created the inequality. You have cavities and you
BabaBlast [244]
If you have less cavities dentist b would be cheaper but if you only have 1 cavity dentist a would be cheaper
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is 9280 ÷ by 32
    10·1 answer
  • Aaron bought a set of plastic ice cubes with a mixture of water and air inside.
    7·2 answers
  • Help pls i need this right now
    11·2 answers
  • Pam wants to put a banner across her garage door, as shown below, to congratulate her son for his college graduation. The garage
    7·2 answers
  • 2x-8y=-24<br> 6x+4y=68<br> Using elimination method
    12·1 answer
  • Distance times time 2 1/2 hours divided by 55 miles per hour
    10·1 answer
  • 15, 11, 7, 3, -1, ... explicit formula and recursive formula
    9·1 answer
  • What is 2/7 and 4/28 with a common denominator
    11·2 answers
  • help thanks for taking the time to help
    8·1 answer
  • Kam
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!